Linda Malek and Jason Johnson are partners in Crowell’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity Groups, and have a particular focus on advising clients on compliance issues related to clinical research and clinical trials. Stephen Holland is Senior Counsel in Crowell’s Government Affairs Group and previously served as Senior Health Counsel to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where he advised on FDA policy, including legislation related to medical devices and laboratory developed tests.

The FDA has provided answers to the most common questions it has received regarding its final rule on laboratory developed tests (LDTs) (the “Final Rule”).  The answers are styled as FAQs that are organized by topic areas.  The FAQs can be found here.  If there is a question that is not answered, the FDA encourages individuals to submit questions to the FDA through the mailbox at ldtfinalrule@fda.hhs.gov.  The FDA notes that it intends to update the FAQs periodically so entities should check the webpage often for additional answers. 

As noted in our client alert regarding the Final Rule, the Final Rule marked a monumental shift in the diagnostic testing regime in the United States and has created a significant amount of questions around compliance and enforcement.  The FAQs provide some insight into FDA’s thinking on certain questions, which should help entities in their implementation of, and compliance with, the requirements of the Final Rule.

For example, the FDA has received a significant number of questions around its enforcement discretion, which are contained within the “Phaseout Policy and Enforcement Discretion Policies” section.  The questions range from very general (e.g., “I am a laboratory with an LDT. Do any enforcement discretion policies apply to my LDT?”—yes, so long as the LDTs are not modified following issuance of the Final Rule) to very specific (e.g., “Do LDTs with NYS CLEP [New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program] approval fall within an enforcement discretion policy in the phaseout policy? What if another lab offers an LDT that is not approved by NYS CLEP but is similar to an LDT approved by NYS CLEP – would it fall within the enforcement discretion policy for LDTs approved by NYS CLEP?”—yes, but the enforcement discretion applies only to the version of the LDT approved by NYS CLEP).  

Entities developing LDTs should prioritize review and monitoring of these FAQs to have the most up to date and relevant information from the FDA as they prepare for potential enforcement during the phase-in period laid out in the preamble to the Final Rule.

Crowell Health Solutions is prepared to assist with questions regarding the Final Rule and LDTs, including compliance planning and monitoring for additional developments at FDA. Please reach out with any questions.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Linda Malek Linda Malek

Linda Malek is a partner in Crowell’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity Groups, where she advises a broad array of health care and life sciences clients on compliance with federal, state, and international law governing clinical research, data privacy, cybersecurity, and fraud

Linda Malek is a partner in Crowell’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity Groups, where she advises a broad array of health care and life sciences clients on compliance with federal, state, and international law governing clinical research, data privacy, cybersecurity, and fraud and abuse. Her clients include national hospitals systems and academic medical centers, genetic and biotechnology companies, pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, financial institutions involved in healthcare services, research foundations and international scientific organizations.

In the healthcare context, Linda is particularly focused on regulatory compliance issues related to clinical research and clinical trials. She creates and implements comprehensive policies governing the conduct of research involving human subjects, and advises clients on human subject research compliance issues. Linda also counsels on legal issues related to conducting secondary research on existing data repositories and tissue banks, including on data privacy and informed consent issues related to the ability to conduct future research. She has experience advising clients on a wide variety of research areas, including biologics, pharmacogenomics, translational research, secondary research, tissue banking, and data repositories. Linda also advises clients in general health care matters related to fraud and abuse, including issues under the Stark laws and federal and state anti-kickback statutes. Her work includes structuring complex transactions in compliance with such laws, assisting in the creation of internal compliance programs, and advising on issues related to the False Claims Act.

Photo of Jason Johnson Jason Johnson

Jason Johnson is a partner in Crowell’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity Groups, where he draws on his experience as a former research scientist to advise clients on complex compliance, legal, regulatory, and transactional matters. He helps clients in the health care

Jason Johnson is a partner in Crowell’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity Groups, where he draws on his experience as a former research scientist to advise clients on complex compliance, legal, regulatory, and transactional matters. He helps clients in the health care and life sciences industries navigate data privacy and cybersecurity issues under U.S. and European law. He also offers strategic insights to assist clients with product development, marketing, clinical research, and other core business initiatives.

Jason is well-versed on even the most complicated regulatory challenges that his clients face. As a former research scientist in academic and pharmaceutical settings, as well as a clinical research monitor who trained physicians, Jason knows the rules firsthand. He employs this knowledge to assist clients with the full range of issues that arise in the research and development process, including drafting and negotiating research, clinical trial, licensing, and manufacturing agreements; intellectual property and technology transfer issues; collection, transfer and sharing of data, including patient registries and bio-repositories; and advising clients on mergers and acquisitions and related transactions. Jason’s clients in this area include academic medical centers, healthcare technology companies, emerging to late stage biotechnology companies, pharmaceutical and medical device companies, and other health care and research organizations.

Photo of Stephen Holland Stephen Holland

Stephen Holland is a senior counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Government Affairs Group, where he leverages his extensive experience advising members of Congress and their staff as a policy advisor and attorney active in health care legislation. Stephen has been responsible for crafting

Stephen Holland is a senior counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Government Affairs Group, where he leverages his extensive experience advising members of Congress and their staff as a policy advisor and attorney active in health care legislation. Stephen has been responsible for crafting dozens of provisions in law to improve food, drug, and medical device innovation and regulation at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), health coverage and access, public health communication and coordination, prescription drug affordability, and emergency preparedness and response.

Prior to joining Crowell, Stephen served in senior policy roles in the U.S. House of Representatives for over 10 years. Most recently, Stephen spent five years on the Energy and Commerce Committee staff under the leadership of Ranking Member and former Chairman Frank Pallone of New Jersey.  On the Committee staff, he was responsible for legislative action related to numerous agencies and programs, including the FDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and the 340B drug program. Notably, his work on the Committee included leading negotiations and drafting of the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), a package of more than 50 policies to expand research, development, and innovation for drugs, medical devices, and personal care products. During the COVID-19 response, Stephen worked to secure billions of dollars for research, development, distribution, and promotion of vaccines, treatment, and diagnostic tests in the CARES Act, the Fiscal Year 2021 Omnibus, and the American Rescue Plan Act.